Anonymous activist X3lj: facing a possible 18 years in jail for alleged participation in #OpCatalunya

Pwnage to Catalonia: Five Things We Know About OpCatalunya

An alleged hacker from Vila-rodona, accused of having illegally accessed a total of 41 websites of different bodies and entities, faces a sentence of 18 years in prison for five continuing crimes of unauthorized access, four more continuous discovery and disclosure of secrets to seize confidential personal data recorded in files and media, and finally two more continuous computer damage.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office, in its provisional indictment, also requests the payment of a fine of 10,800 euros, which for the duration of the sentence is disqualified by any trade or profession related to the provision of computer services and also a ban on access to a telecommunications network and contracting of internet services through telecommunications service providers, providers of access to a telecommunications network or information society services for a period of more than one year. the prison sentence imposed on him.

“But what disgusts me the most is that I can get more years than the abuser or rapist on duty. more than 18 years to fight for the freedoms of everyone on the net.” – @YourAnonX3lj

In terms of civil liability, it faces paying 165.55 euros to the Fundación de Ferrocarriles Españoles, 1,095.60 to Fhecor Ingenieros Consultores SA and 500 to Tesoro Público. And finally, the Public Ministry requests that the confiscated material, once formatted, be destroyed.

Social Networks
The defendant is a neighbor of the aforementioned town of Alt Camp who on February 2, 2012 registered an account on the social network Twitter. Membership in the Anonymous movement was attributed to the inclusion of related logos and slogans. He also used identifying information from the so-called Operation Catalonia through the hashtag #OpCatalunya. The defendant, who had up to 1,232 followers in the said account, has his domicile in Vila-rodona.

The prosecutor’s account goes on to point out that the defendant, “for the purpose and purpose of being introduced on different web pages, without the permission of the administrators of the same, obtained information and data reserved or secret and made this information available to third parties ». The attacks took place between December 17, 2017 and February 27, 2018.

“I’ve been waiting for trial since I got out of the filthy civil guard dungeon, but life is like this, I’m just one more revolutionary f’^ked by the state.” – @YourAnonX3lj

With this system, for example, the defendant carried out an attack on the website of the Fundación de Ferrocarriles Españoles. There, he removed access data from the webmaster, creating a new one as well as new entries on the news board, claiming responsibility for the attack. Modified tables in the page databases and accessed tables, personal affiliation data, usernames, email accounts, and passwords.

And on February 8, 2018, through this account, he posted two messages with information regarding this attack. In the first, posted at 12:47 p.m., he claimed responsibility for the attack by displaying four images containing a sample of the information collected through illegitimate intrusion into its database and a capture with the modification of the website. . It also included tags with #Anonymus, #OpCatalunya and #FreeCatalanPoliticalPrisioners. In the second message, posted at 1:26 p.m., it showed captures and passwords recorded on the website.

A server from Italy
In other cases, such as when he entered the website of the Center for Astrobiology of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), he used a server in Italy to hide his IP address. He took names, surnames and email addresses of people linked to this website. This information was later made public through his Twitter profile.

In most attacks, he obtained usernames, passwords, and emails. Also bank and PayPal data.

On February 27, 2018, officers, with judicial authorization, preceded him to enter the suspect’s home in order to search him. They confiscated a desktop computer, a hard drive extracted from the computer, a flash drive and a mobile phone.

Parts of this article was translated from an article originally in the Catalan language written by Àngel Juanpere – published on 06/28/2020.

Craig Murray asks for support “Authoritarianism is Shoddy”

This is a copy of what Craig Murray,(friend of Mr Assange), posted today where he asks for support from the community. Like Mr. Assange, Murray is getting at taste of what happens when the establishment comes for you. The rules of law being bent and abused to take down a truth teller is something that concerns us all. The below is an unedited copy of Murray’s blog post

Well, it is really happening. It is something of a shock to see yourself listed as a criminal for writing the truth. I have a tiny extra glimpse now into the way my friend Julian has been feeling.

Three appeal court judges even at the procedural hearing – though not unheard of, that is not normal. The state is sparing no resources on this; in a sense I am flattered.

There will be no jury at the eventual trial, and this worries me. Not least because the indictment (called a “petition”) contains within itself evidence that this process is a stitch up. Please help me here, and read paras 49 to 56 of the indictment after reading this explanation.

Para 49 of the indictment is an utter garble. It states that I sent a twitter message beginning “It is respectfully submitted…”.

I sent no such twitter message. Para 50 is missing. This is not a misnumbering, para 50 really is missing. I assume my twitter message, intended to be quoted at para 49, and whatever led in to the Crown’s argument beginning “it is respectively submitted” were in the missing section.

At para 53 the same thing happens again. It explicitly states that I published another tweet starting: “it is respectfully submitted that”.

I published no such tweet. Again the indictment does not give the actual text of the tweet complained of, even though it claims to do so. This time two paragraphs are clearly missing, and again this is not just a misnumbering, because of the missing material. It jumps from 53 to 56.

In short, the indictment from paras 49 to 56 is an inoperable jumble, with three paras missing from two different locations and which does not even contain – though it states it does – the very tweets which form part of the alleged offence with which I am charged.

You may argue this does not matter, and clerical errors are easily corrected. But that is to miss the point. I used to prepare official documents in my 20 year diplomatic career, from ministerial replies to members of the public to fully fledged international treaties.

A Diplomatic Note to a foreign government, which has a legal status, might be the best comparator from my work to this indictment or petition. I always scrupulously proof read every one I sent before signing. It is unthinkable that a Diplomatic Note would be sent containing not one but a series of major, material errors.

Is this document any less solemn? It is an indictment on which they are attempting to brand me a criminal and potentially send me to prison for up to two years. It is signed by Alex Prentice, Depute Advocate General on behalf of the Lord Advocate, and by the senior judge, Lord Turnbull.

But one thing is abundantly clear. Neither Alex Prentice nor Lord Turnbull can have carefully read through the document before they signed it. I do not believe for one moment that they would knowingly sign off a document containing such major errors. The judge, in particular, is meant to weigh carefully the matter to see if there really is a case to answer before he signs the Crown’s “petition”. But, I say it again, plainly Lord Turnbull has not actually read through it; or he would never have signed this garbled mess.

I am advised that it may be “contempt of court” for me to point out that Lord Turnbull signed this without reading it. But when a law makes it illegal to point out a blindingly obvious fact, then the law is an ass.

If Lord Turnbull does not wish to be criticised, he should try doing his job properly and actually paying attention to what he signs.

Contempt is the right word. I have a great deal of contempt for anybody who would send me such a portentous legal document rotten through with utterly careless error which would have been spotted by even a cursory reading of the document.

They did not read it. The judge who approved it did not read it.

Neither of them bothered to read the indictment or petition because it had already been decided to “get” Craig Murray and it therefore did not matter what the document actually said. The content of the charges is immaterial to them. Otherwise, they would have read them before signing. There can only be two reasons for that failure. The first is incompetence. The second is corruption. In a sense, it does not matter which it is in this case.

A state which is turning to authoritarianism to crush dissent does not need to be very careful about matters of process.

The failure of both Prentice and Turnbull to read before signing is not important for the mistakes in the document, which can be remedied by a new document. It is important because of the clear indication of attitude. This prosecution is abuse of process, a clear Article Six violation under the European Convention on Human Rights.

A series of facts make this abundantly plain. The abuse of process lies in this combined with the extraordinary selectivity in prosecuting me, when others who can be objectively proven to have much more effectively produced “jigsaw identification” are not prosecuted. There is a very clear political motivation behind the selection of who to prosecute and who not to prosecute.

When you put together the facts that there is overwhelming evidence that mainstream media journalists were more guilty of “jigsaw identification” than I, that systematic police action is being taken to harass only supporters of Alex Salmond, and that they don’t even care what the indictment to be used against me actually says, the overall picture becomes very, very clear.

Authoritarianism doesn’t have to worry about mistakes in the indictment, because it can just smash you in the face with the jackboot. That is what is happening here.

My own view is that they were so keen to “get” Craig Murray they just signed without any proper scrutiny whatsoever. I don’t see any other conclusion. Do you?

They do not have the excuse that this is routine. Major prosecutions for contempt in Scotland are extremely rare – the last one was Aamer Anwar about a decade ago (it failed).

So why could the state be so keen to prosecute Craig Murray, that is doesn’t even care what is in the indictment, or even if it is drawn up with the most basic level of competence? Well, I refer you to this excellent letter setting out the fact that the state is only acting against those who defended the innocent Alex Salmond, even though his detractors were much more in contempt of court. And I refer you to the Panelbase opinion poll which showed that very substantially more people who know the identities of the accusers, learnt them from the mainstream media.

I remain clear that I identified nobody. If I had wanted to, I would have done so openly. I have never been noted for cowardice.

The other accusation, that I wrote articles stating that the prosecution of Alex Salmond was a fit-up, is something I state again here. It is a proper exercise of my freedom of speech under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Actually, you don’t have to go past the very first sentence of the indictment to understand what is happening here. It reads “On 23 January 2019, Alexander Elliott Anderson Salmond was arrested by police officers in relation to a number of incidents that had taken place in Scotland.”

“That had taken place”.
Not “alleged to have taken place”.
“That had taken place”.
And Prentice wrote this, and Turnbull signed it off, after the acquittal.

After independent witnesses gave eye witness accounts that several of the incidents had not taken place at all. After it was demonstrated in court that the accuser of the most serious offence was not even present when she claimed the offence took place.

After the jury threw out the pile of ordure that the very same Alex Prentice as prosecuting counsel presented to them.

“That had taken place”. No, most of the incidents had not taken place at all, and none in the form alleged.

Right at the start, this wording gives away the motivation. The conspirators have still not psychologically processed the fact their attack on Alex Salmond was foiled by the jury. The Crown is now coming at Mark Hirst and at me in an effort to get some kind of victory from this massive waste of public resources. The conspirators seek to assuage their massive humiliation in the failure of a prosecution that stank and quite obviously ought never to have been brought.

I am not going to pipe down under this abuse of process and attack on freedom of speech. On the contrary, this will be a reasoned, forceful and very public resistance.


The hearing on 10 June is supposed to be public, but it will be virtual because of coronavirus. While it is a case management hearing, I shall nevertheless be grateful if you are able to “attend” virtually, as I am very keen indeed that I am not stitched up out of the public eye. Please send an email requesting access to the virtual hearing on 10 June to I am very keen as many people do this as possible. Journalists please in addition copy in for accreditation.

Secondly, many people come to this blog through social media and I am currently suffering a very high level of suppression, on Facebook and especially on Twitter. Rather than just retweet and share any soical media post that brought you here, (which may appear on the face to have worked but the dissemination will be suppressed), I would be very grateful if you could also write your own new posting and put a link. If you have your own blog or access to one, a commendation of this post with a link would be very welcome, even if it is not your normal policy. And finally of course, the entire post is free as always to copy, republish and translate as you wish.

Twitter Support: Discrimination and Censorship, an unwritten policy?

This is an edited and modified (expanded) version of the comments I submitted to Twitter in response to their survey where I gave them a failing grade of 1 out 5. ~Kitty Hundal, Co-Founder of Hacktivist Culture 

UPDATE 2019/08/02: Added comments on Twitters censorship algorithm which automatically suspends accounts.

UPDATE 2019/08/03: @kittyhundal, my Twitter account was suspended early in the evening yesterday. Today, my professional account, @kittyhundaldc was suspended. Neither account received any warning or options like temporary lockdowns, removal of posts, etc. Twitter Support claims that I am creating multiple accounts for harassment despite the fact that both are long term accounts. My professional account never engages trolls and I was simply defending my reputation and exposing the troll’s hypocrisy with evidence on my main account which is 99% used for social activism and personal interactions. Was it because of this article? Or the same trolls @trancegemini was defending me from? I have no idea at this point. It could be either. Details will be provided in a second article next week. 

UPDATE 2019/08/04: Updating Kaidinn’s current troll activity with a more in depth explanation including what appears to be a possible alliance with someone in Twitter Support who is engaging in deceptive practices to protect Kaidinn’s account and to collude in targeting the accounts that Kaidinn is targeting by keeping them suspended on false fabricated grounds.

IMO Twitter Support engages in discriminatory practices which result in censorship of activist voices, amplification of trolls abusing those activists, and it does so consistently.

I’ve seen the same pattern repeated over and over again. Obvious harassment accounts, newly created, and in some cases older accounts, which engage in mostly harassment behavior and little else, target long term stable activist and independent journalist accounts with abuse which clearly violates the Twitter ToS. Yet Twitter Support seems to come up with numerous excuses for why they shouldn’t be suspended. Instead they appear to be protected.

Twitter Support either takes no action or limited “slap on the wrist” type actions against those harassment accounts which are rarely suspended and even if they are locked their defamations and abuse remains publicly out there for all to see.

Meanwhile, long term stable accounts, especially activist accounts that are anti-establishment – including numerous credible independent journalists – that defend themselves against these vile troll lies and defamations, are routinely suspended at the drop of a hat. Illegal 3d party bots are frequently used by these harassment accounts to accomplish that task.

I can provide numerous examples of this. However, the three most prominent and recent accounts are those of Unity4J (an activist support account for Julian Assange), Barrett Brown and Caitlin Johnstone, both well known independent journalists.

This is outrageous behavior on the part of Twitter Support which I have already brought to Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey’s attention and will continue to do so. In fact, this response to your survey will be published and directed to his attention on Twitter. If you suspend me I’ll simply have friends do it. You will not shut me up when it comes to demanding publicly that Twitter address this issue which according to Dorsey is a problem he recognizes:

YouTube: Jack Dorsey: Not proud of how Twitter has been weaponized


The current situation that I’m objecting to is a perfect example of this.

The OBVIOUS harassment account, @u4jTERRORISTorg created just a few months ago, with an incomplete profile  in which it attacks an activist organization with the most vile libel and where it ADMITS to being a TROLL, is being given all kinds of opportunities and “advice” to keep their account alive effectively enabling them to continue their abuse.


I received the below in response to a report against the harassment account. Note that the harassment account is not locked, continues to tweet and has just set itself to private to avoid further reporting. So, it would seem that this email from Twitter Support either isn’t true or someone else in Twitter Support removed the lock quickly. Why is that? NOTE: It was actually locked down shortly after I released this article initially. It was tweeting when I started writing the article.


On the other hand, @trancegemini’s ELEVEN year old Twitter account which was created a year after Twitter was founded was suspended without any notification whatsoever and on specious grounds since the account was simply defending me and others by responding to the lies of the above harassment account and exposing them. This account wasn’t given any suggestions or opportunities to “correct” the “problems”, like the above harassment account was.


Unity4J, Barrett Brown and Caitlin Johnstone, all experienced the same obtuse approach from Twitter Support. BB and CJs accounts were only restored after press inquiries were made. In the case of Unity4J it took a full independent media campaign including a public statement by Roger Waters of Pink Floyd calling Twitter on their censorship before Twitter Support bothered to unsuspend the account.

Roger Waters of Pink Floyd Tweet with video statement


The harassment account @u4jTERRORISTorg has engaged in far more abusive behavior than @trancegemini did and that is obvious when one compares tweets between the two accounts. The @trancegemini account can still see their tweets so screenshots of the evidence of that fact can be provided.

It’s shocking to me that this is how Twitter treats their committed long term users. That action, by Twitter Support, of suspending an 11 year old Twitter account with no notification, no explanation as to why and no opportunity to correct whatever might have been done wrong, in itself was abusive AND discriminatory.

Especially given that Twitter Support refuses to suspend the harassment account which is openly and with complete impunity violating the Twitter ToS. That account is being given all sorts of opportunities and advice to correct it’s behavior which it is mostly ignoring while lying to Twitter Support to justify it’s abusive behavior.

It’s pretending to be left wing, anti-racist, anti-pedo and pretending the people like me it’s attacking are the opposite. Yet all of the people it’s attacking with accusations of “white supremacist, antisemitic, neonazi” are People of Color and Jewish who are anti-racist, anti-Pedo, anti-fascist activists.

Meanwhile the harassment account @u4jTERRORISTorg is run by a woman, claiming to be white, who was a David Duke follower and claims that a bunch of People of Color were capable of getting David Duke to block a white person. Does that even make sense? Seriously? If she wasn’t a white supremacist why would she even care that David Duke blocked her and why was she following him?

This pattern of response isn’t the odd exception from Twitter Support.

It’s consistent and standard practice which appears to be unwritten and unacknowledged policy. In other words, these harassment accounts actually appear to be protected by Twitter Support.

It’s not clear whether it is just the act of individuals who have worked for Twitter for years at a supervisory level and have control over how policy is implemented (or ignored) or whether that is actual Twitter Support unwritten policy. Either way, the outcome is the same for the Twitter user.

Dorsey’s public statements would indicate that it is NOT Twitter policy, in which case Twitter Support is not only routinely violating Twitters policies as stated by Dorsey but is also openly and routinely violating it’s own Twitter ToS to protect these obvious harassment accounts.

When I state they are obvious I mean the following Use Case is standard on their part:

  1. They are newly created AND/OR
  2. Their main activity is to fight with people by lying and defaming them
  3. Most don’t have profiles OR their profiles are obviously abusive troll profiles
  4. When required to authenticate themselves they either abandon the account leaving their defamation openly available to link to or they use web sites which offer SMS services to authenticate.
  5. This part of the Use Case speaks for itself.

This person appears to be unaware of the inconvenient truth that defamation laws exist because Free Speech doesn’t include any right to libel/slander people.

The @u4jTERRORISTorg (now private) has already abandoned two previous accounts: @CocksDavida (now private) @vcruytldczsdfa (remains public). Neither of these accounts have been suspended despite the abuse they’ve heaped on people. She has now (August 2) created another one @MackenzieCaswa (now private) and as you can see by the above screenshot is planning to continue to create more. On August 3, she created @ormeserre43 (public).

On August 5, she created @quesiocvi62 to evade a request for phone number authentication on @ormeserre43. The following is her screenshot attached to her tweet on the new @quesiocvi62 account.

Note that if she was serious about not continuing her harassment campaign, she would have deleted all of the fake harassment accounts and created a legitimate account which doesn’t target and harass me and others with lies. Instead she looks for excuses to rationalize continuing the abuse.


Not only is this harassment account continuing to escalate her targeting of the accounts she’s currently harassing but she’s also adding people to her target list and doing so openly. Note that Christy has simply blocked her and has never engaged with her in any way. She doesn’t even know who she is. Yet the harassment account is threatening her in an attempt to intimidate her into not supporting me. She’s tagged numerous accounts (40 to 50) and tried to incite them into pressuring Christy into not supporting me based on her smear campaign of outright lies.

She’s made some of the accounts private to protect them from reporting while leaving others public. If the public accounts (which are 50% filled with libel) are suspended, she’ll simply make one of her other currently private accounts public and so on.

Someone in Twitter Support appears to be colluding with this activity by suspending the accounts she attacks on the grounds that they are engaging in the activity that she is actually engaging in. Her preventive measures are likely there just in case someone were to over-rule her Twitter Support allies obviously deceptive decisions.

If Twitter Support were serious about eliminating this type of abuse it’s an easy matter to identify those accounts as per the above Use Case and permanently ban them. Yet that isn’t done.

In addition, the premises behind Twitters censorship algorithm which automatically suspends accounts is deeply flawed and very likely the cause of many of the problems users are facing. The censorship algorithm is based on two flawed concepts:

  1. Scanning for individual words that are considered “bad” like “whore” “retard” to name a couple.
  2. The number of reports against an account by different accounts.

Point 1 above is flawed because words are meaningless without context and it takes a human being to evaluate context. While I suppose it’s possible to write an algorithm that can do that these days, the reality is that Twitters algorithm doesn’t do it or it doesn’t do it properly. The @yonsolitary account was automatically suspended with no recourse for a simple typo, “hoe” which could have been identified as a typo by a human being reviewing it in context. It took weeks for @yonsolitary to get their account unsuspended with pressure from friends.

Point 2 above is flawed because it opens the door for shady elements to create and implement Report Bots which can trigger Twitters censorship algorithm to automatically suspend accounts without cause.

It’s likely that was what resulted in @trancegemini’s 11 year old account to be brought down so quickly and it has been suspended for weeks now. @trancegemini has opened TWO cases and made numerous attempts to interact with Twitter Support to get an explanation for the suspension and to try to get the decision reversed. All attempts have been ignored. When the first case was closed one email was sent by Twitter Support simply declaring that the ToS had been violated. All previous emails had been ignored. The second case is still open and all efforts to communicate with Twitter Support continue to be ignored.

To make matters worse, this behavior by Twitter Support, in my experience and in the experience of many others is the standard not the exception. They refuse to engage with the user who has been unfairly suspended. It usually takes external pressure of some kind to get the accounts restored and even that doesn’t work sometimes.

A similar thing happened a few years ago on Facebook and masses of people left FB. More continue to leave. Those that remain like me barely use it anymore. There’s just way too much interference with good stable accounts like mine which was a Facebook BETA user and the Troll accounts which disrupt us constantly with false reports and which FB protects, much like Twitter is doing.

Twitter appears to be going down the same path and doesn’t have the user base (in my opinion) to survive it if accounts like mine either leave en masse or reduce our use of Twitter.

It was accounts like mine and @trancegemini, the early users of Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Google, that made these companies into the billion dollar businesses that they are.

It’s a real shame that those companies, including Twitter, are spitting in the faces of the very hands that fed them.

I, and many other activist and independent media accounts are looking at other options.

This is Twitter’s warning call. Unless you want to lose the support base that built you, you’re going to need to make a major change in approach here, and Twitter would be well-advised to listen.

All of that said, it should be noted that I think Twitter should legally be considered a Public Space where the 1st Amendment applies and censorship doesn’t occur.

So, I disagree with Twitter having a ToS at all. However, since they do have one, it shouldn’t be abused to censor activist voices and amplify trolls which is precisely what is happening and happening on a consistent basis.

Please unsuspend @kittyhundal‘s 10 year old personal and activist Twitter account of which 99% of the tweets and RTs are related to promoting social activist causes and interacting with friends. 1% of tweets are related to protecting her personal and professional reputation from defamations spread by harassment trolls.

Please unsuspend @kittyhundaldc’s 8 year old account which is @kittyhundal‘s author account (previously her business account), clearly states that in the profile and has a different purpose and following than her personal and activist account. It has never engaged with the trolls attacking @kittyhundal‘s reputation or commented on the trolls or any troll libel. 

Please unsuspend @trancegemini’s 11 year old Twitter account which was created one year after Twitter was founded, is a long term stable account likely suspended by short term harassment troll accounts using bots.

Please also unsuspend @an0nkn0wledge, an independent journalist with an 8 year old, long term stable Twitter account with 30K followers, suspended by short term harassment troll accounts using bots.


#OPINION – Rampant Intellectual Dishonesty and its consequences

From every corner of my world I hear people saying, and getting away with it, that Wikileaks helped Manning steal documents. Saying that it’s a crime and that Assange must face justice. Everybody knows thats not at all why.

Wikileaks have released over 10 million documents, parts of which has embarrassed the powerful by clearly showing criminal behaviour by those that are supposed to represent the people. It’s a warning dressed as revenge, pure and simple. It’s chilling effect cannot be overlooked.

Anyone claiming to actually believe Assange is arrested for attempting to hack a password is a liar. A few lie to themselves or suffer from complete and utter ignorance – while others blatantly & willfully bend the truth beyond recognition.

If your’e a journalist, you should understand that these glaringly provable lies not only hurts your credibility but all of the 4th estate’s ability to hold the powerful accountable. Your’e aiding and abetting the creation of totalitarian rule. Not born of law, but of greed.

About *The Willfully Blatantly Intellectually Dishonest* I say:

Forgive them Not for They Know full well what They are Doing.

Many are running around saying Mr. Assange is not a journalist. Its not only laughable, its downright ridiculous – coming from someone that breaks the only unwritten law about journalism we all tended to agreed on:

– To confront and undress the corrupt and criminal – by reporting on it

Dressing up this “rendition” as a charge of hacking, (CFAA), that will only give Assange 5 years in jail and not hurt journalism – is pure and utter bullshit and you have to a moron to think we swallow that you actually believe what you are serving up. It’s a narrative, is all.

Americans are specialists in constructing narratives making even the worst crimes against humanity look like humanitarian expeditions. The country has basically taken the dressing up of pigs to a whole new level whereby it seems, from the outside, it has become the national sport.

At some point history will treat you badly, of that I’m sure, but your victims are paying the price now. We, the concerned citizens of the world. are guilty of letting you get away with it. I feel shame, in myself and my fellow man. We are the “the submissive void” of our time.


Raymond Johansen – April 2019

Hacktivist Culture: Witness Against Torture

Raymond Johansen, a torture victim and co-founder of Hacktivist Culture, speaks out against global torture campaigns by various governments, in particular the US and the UK.

Potkaars podcasts: 2019-01-14 Witness against Torture – Raymond Johansen

Kitty Hundal, a target of state persecution and co-founder of Hacktivist Culture: Personal Statement on Torture.

Countries that are signatories to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment are required, as per Article 2 of the Convention, to make torture a criminal offense in their countries and most, including the US, Canada and UK, have done so.

Article 2

1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.

2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.

3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.

18 U.S. Code § 2340A – Torture

(a) Offense.—

Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

UK Criminal Justice Act 1988 c. 33 Part XI Torture Section 134

134 Torture.

(1)A public official or person acting in an official capacity, whatever his nationality, commits the offence of torture if in theUnited Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance or purported performance of his official duties.


(3)It is immaterial whether the pain or suffering is physical or mental and whether it is caused by an act or an omission.

Canada Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46)


269.1 (1) Every official, or every person acting at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of an official, who inflicts torture on any other person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Yet renditions and Black sites like Guantanamo as well as secret Black sites continue to proliferate both within the countries that are signatories, in violation of their domestic laws/due process, and on foreign soil, in direct contravention of the Convention.

Chicago’s “Black Site” Police Scandal Is Primed to Explode AgainChicago’s “Black Site” Police Scandal Is Primed to Explode Again

Homan Square detention facility is reportedly like something out of “Homeland.”

On the basis of internal Chicago police records, the Guardian‘s Spencer Ackerman reported in February that officers had brought thousands of detainees (mostly black, often low-level drug offenders) to Homan Square, where they were essentially “disappeared”—held and questioned without access to attorneys or phone calls. Of 7,185 people detained there since 2004, Ackerman wrote, just 68 had access to a lawyer or were able to make their whereabouts known to family or friends—about 65 percent of the detentions took place after May 16, 2011, when Emanuel took office.

“US must stop policy of impunity for the crime of torture”- UN rights expert“US must stop policy of impunity for the crime of torture”- UN rights expert

“By failing to prosecute the crime of torture in CIA custody, the US is in clear violation of the Convention against Torture and is sending a dangerous message of complacency and impunity to officials in the US and around the world.”

Many of these torture sites have professional medical and psychiatric/psychological personnel on staff who participate actively, not only in developing and advancing the torture programs but in participating directly as well.

This is a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code established to prevent further horrors like those which occurred during the Holocaust against the Jews in Nazi Germany.

Nuremberg Betrayed: Human Experimentation and the CIA Torture Program

Based on an analysis of thousands of pages of documents and years of research, Physicians for Human Rights shows that the CIA’s post-9/11 torture program constituted an illegal, unethical regime of experimental research on unwilling human subjects, testing the flawed hypothesis that torture could aid interrogators in breaking the resistance of detainees. In “Nuremberg Betrayed: Human Experimentation and the CIA Torture Program,” PHR researchers show that CIA contract psychologists James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen created a research program in which health professionals designed and applied torture techniques and collected data on torture’s effects. This constitutes one of the gravest breaches of medical ethics by U.S. health personnel since the Nuremberg Code was developed in the wake of Nazi medical atrocities committed during World War Two.

In addition, the Intelligence Agencies of many countries are being given legal carte blanche to engage in “Disrupt and Destroy” campaigns. Campaigns which are often engaged in, without judicial oversight, or oversight which is exercised at the discretion of the Agency and without transparency, abuses would inevitably occur. This is a historical fact.

Canada Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 (S.C. 2015, c. 20)Canada Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 (S.C. 2015, c. 20)

12.1 (1) If there are reasonable grounds to believe that a particular activity constitutes a threat to the security of Canada, the Service may take measures, within or outside Canada, to reduce the threat.


(2) The measures shall be reasonable and proportional in the circumstances, having regard to the nature of the threat, the nature of the measures and the reasonable availability of other means to reduce the threat.


(3) The Service shall not take measures to reduce a threat to the security of Canada if those measures will contravene a right or freedom guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or will be contrary to other Canadian law, unless the Service is authorized to take them by a warrant issued under section 21.1.

So, what does this tell us about the current state of our society and it’s approach towards Torture?

It tells us that our governments have gone rogue. They are openly violating domestic and international law, at the behest of the global elite and their military industrial complex, which is expanding by the day.

It tells us we are being ruled by criminals who hold the reins of power and will never hold themselves accountable for their own crimes.

It tells us that We, the People, need to act to hold the bastions of power accountable for their crimes. We need to do this through the enforcement of transparency as well as by becoming the media so that we can enlighten and educate the unaware. Then, we need to use that knowledge and education to rebuild our democracies and social infrastructures into healthy ones. Ones which represent the best interests of the people as a whole, rein in and limit the powers of the elite, while also enshrining individual and social rights as natural, inviolable rights.

by Kitty Hundal